Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 8 Feb 2021 13:34:24 -0700
From:      Alan Somers <asomers@freebsd.org>
To:        joe mcguckin <joe@via.net>
Cc:        freebsd-fs <freebsd-fs@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: zpool list vs df free space?
Message-ID:  <CAOtMX2g9zqFw22213UUyi-dM2%2Bed=0Ou_D0mWonW3ju24qfrFA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <8BF84A0F-E66D-423A-AB99-0D19A9BB37EE@via.net>
References:  <8BF84A0F-E66D-423A-AB99-0D19A9BB37EE@via.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
df is reporting usable space.  "zpool list" includes RAID overhead and
padding blocks.  Try "zfs list" instead.  That should be closer to what df
reports.

On Mon, Feb 8, 2021 at 1:27 PM joe mcguckin <joe@via.net> wrote:

> df -h reports 66T available
>
> zpool list says 102T
>
> Why the discrepency?
>
> This is on a system with 7 16Tb drives configured as raidz2.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Joe
>
>
> Joe McGuckin
> ViaNet Communications
>
> joe@via.net
> 650-207-0372 cell
> 650-213-1302 office
> 650-969-2124 fax
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-fs@freebsd.org mailing list
> https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-fs
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-fs-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
>



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAOtMX2g9zqFw22213UUyi-dM2%2Bed=0Ou_D0mWonW3ju24qfrFA>