Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2011 12:25:02 +0300 From: Kostik Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com> To: John Hay <jhay@meraka.org.za> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: freebsd-9.0 smartmontools and ada devices Message-ID: <20111018092502.GH50300@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> In-Reply-To: <20111018090242.GA8339@zibbi.meraka.csir.co.za> References: <20111018073924.GA3644@zibbi.meraka.csir.co.za> <20111018090242.GA8339@zibbi.meraka.csir.co.za>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--7J16OGEJ/mt06A90 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 11:02:42AM +0200, John Hay wrote: > On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 09:39:24AM +0200, John Hay wrote: > > Hi Guys, > >=20 > > I have upgraded my desktop from 8.2-stable to 9.0-RC1 (from source), us= ing > > a GENERIC kernel. I have installed the smartmontools-5.41_3 package from > > a mirror and found that smartmontools does not like the ada devices any= more. > > Previously (8.2) I had a GENERIC kernel, with ahci loaded in loader.con= f. > > There an older smartmontools (5.40) worked without a problem on the ada > > devices. > >=20 > > The output of smartctl looks like this: > >=20 > > ############################# > > dolphin# smartctl -a /dev/ada0 > > smartctl 5.41 2011-06-09 r3365 [FreeBSD 9.0-RC1 amd64] (local build) > > Copyright (C) 2002-11 by Bruce Allen, http://smartmontools.sourceforge.= net > >=20 > > error sending CAMIOCOMMAND ioctl: Inappropriate ioctl for device > > Unable to get CAM device list > > /dev/ada0: Unable to detect device type > > Smartctl: please specify device type with the -d option. > >=20 > > Use smartctl -h to get a usage summary > >=20 > > ############################# >=20 > Just to follow up on myself. :-( I have build smartmontools from ports and > even though it is the same version, it works. So for me the package > amd64/packages-9-current/All/smartmontools-5.41_3.tbz did not work, but t= he > port does. CAM ABI was changed right before RC1. The issue was mentioned in the Ken' announcement. The packages were obviously built with the old headers. --7J16OGEJ/mt06A90 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAk6dRe4ACgkQC3+MBN1Mb4gUNQCguHipUrJs5sEimOypD7v9KJqH xRwAoPBlohJaA12NdcYvRoPAIfl+xJQn =fv68 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --7J16OGEJ/mt06A90--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20111018092502.GH50300>