Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2011 19:40:19 +0000 From: Chris Rees <crees@freebsd.org> To: Doug Barton <dougb@freebsd.org> Cc: cvs-ports@freebsd.org, freebsd-xfce@freebsd.org, cvs-all@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/sysutils/xfce4-utils Makefile Message-ID: <CADLo83-1Az-xJ0qnFU7NUAqCpRfARnM0bvp60hTvPOZRLztaOA@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <CADLo838TKwEZwLfXsAYmXowKweM8MiC5=BT5NFGyegWyubcX=A@mail.gmail.com> References: <201112181751.pBIHpivv027591@repoman.freebsd.org> <4EEF0AF1.20501@FreeBSD.org> <CADLo838TKwEZwLfXsAYmXowKweM8MiC5=BT5NFGyegWyubcX=A@mail.gmail.com>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
On 19 December 2011 10:03, Chris Rees <crees@freebsd.org> wrote: > > On 19 Dec 2011 09:59, "Doug Barton" <dougb@freebsd.org> wrote: >> >> Thanks, that's 1/3 of the job done. :) The problem is that the current >> OPTION creates the false idea that the only way you can lock your screen >> is to use xlockmore. >> >> Perhaps you missed my followup where I mentioned that the next step >> would be to add an OPTION for xscreensaver as well, and the logic to >> avoid having them both defined. OK, before I commit another patch.... Are you sure it's necessary to avoid having both defined? It won't break anything to have both enabled, and they're both disabled by default... Chrishome | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CADLo83-1Az-xJ0qnFU7NUAqCpRfARnM0bvp60hTvPOZRLztaOA>