Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 18:20:57 +0300 From: Giorgos Keramidas <keramida@freebsd.org> To: Joel Dahl <joel@freebsd.org> Cc: doc-committers@freebsd.org, Andre Oppermann <andre@freebsd.org>, cvs-doc@freebsd.org, cvs-all@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: www/en index.xsl Message-ID: <20060512152057.GA25843@gothmog.pc> In-Reply-To: <1147445925.670.14.camel@localhost> References: <200605120254.k4C2s3BS052028@repoman.freebsd.org> <1147445925.670.14.camel@localhost>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 2006-05-12 16:58, Joel Dahl <joel@FreeBSD.org> wrote: >On Fri, 2006-05-12 at 02:54 +0000, Andre Oppermann wrote: >> andre 2006-05-12 02:54:03 UTC >> >> FreeBSD doc repository (src committer) >> >> Modified files: >> en index.xsl >> Log: >> Alpha has left the building. Add ARM and rearrange the list of >> architectures a bit. > > I always encourage src and ports developers to spend more time on > documentation, but changes to the front page @ FreeBSD.org should > always be discussed/reviewed/approved by a doc committer. A good > place to discuss these things is on the www@ mailing list. > > Alpha have been nuked in HEAD, but we're still supporting it in > 6.X, and we still have some Alpha users around. Besides, we still > have a lot of Alpha-specific information on our website and in our > documentation, so it's not as easy as just removing the word "Alpha" > from the front page. Removing all of this will probably happen > (maybe in time for 7.0?), but now is not the right time, IMHO. > > Please back this out. Leaving ARM in will get more exposure to the efforts people have been putting into ARM support, so maybe a full backout is not really obligatory in this case?
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060512152057.GA25843>