Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2003 18:12:26 +0100 From: Miguel Mendez <flynn@energyhq.homeip.net> To: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Should we have a lyx-qt slave port? Message-ID: <20030311181226.05c23f07.flynn@energyhq.homeip.net>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--=.kL9iJ'b(h1w(Fg
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Seeing that quite some people seem to prefer the QT3 frontend instead of
the old xforms, one, should we have a slave port (lyx-qt) that defaults
to it? I'll have a go at it as soon as my FreeBSD box is back up.
Cheers,
--
Miguel Mendez - flynn@energyhq.homeip.net
GPG Public Key :: http://energyhq.homeip.net/files/pubkey.txt
EnergyHQ :: http://www.energyhq.tk
Of course it runs NetBSD!
Tired of Spam? -> http://www.trustic.com
--=.kL9iJ'b(h1w(Fg
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (NetBSD)
iD8DBQE+bhj9nLctrNyFFPERAsDZAJ4y1mUrfeQDqJSVSAU16PoBA4XbdACgqsEg
FM45GtNZc406GWMjJo2mapc=
=cDgU
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=.kL9iJ'b(h1w(Fg--
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030311181226.05c23f07.flynn>