Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2001 18:32:07 +0200 From: Neil Blakey-Milner <nbm@mithrandr.moria.org> To: Mixtim <mixtim@home.com> Cc: Mike Hoskins <mike@adept.org>, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Regarding hw.ata.wc="1"...... Message-ID: <20010724183207.D31997@mithrandr.moria.org> In-Reply-To: <20010724121425.A4439@home.com>; from mixtim@home.com on Tue, Jul 24, 2001 at 12:14:25PM -0400 References: <5.1.0.14.0.20010724103842.064dde20@marble.sentex.ca> <Pine.BSF.4.21.0107240809090.92392-100000@snafu.adept.org> <20010724121425.A4439@home.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue 2001-07-24 (12:14), Mixtim wrote: > On Tue, Jul 24, 2001 at 08:12:58AM -0700, Mike Hoskins wrote: > > Hmm. I hope the response to recent performance tests was /not/ to make a > > potentially unsafe option 'default'. > > Its only unsafe if you lose power. I think that anyone running a > "server" without a UPS deserves to lose data. UPS's die. More often than using standard power in some areas. And you're also discounting all sorts of hardware power issues that may occur. Neil -- Neil Blakey-Milner nbm@mithrandr.moria.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010724183207.D31997>