Date: Mon, 09 Dec 2002 10:05:28 +0100 From: Marc Recht <marc@informatik.uni-bremen.de> To: David Schultz <dschultz@uclink.Berkeley.EDU> Cc: freebsd-standards@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: POSIX and the real life or FreeBSD too strict ? Message-ID: <1004540000.1039424728@leeloo.intern.geht.de> In-Reply-To: <20021209001645.GA1618@HAL9000.homeunix.com> References: <584000000.1039360297@leeloo.intern.geht.de> <20021208203949.GA535@HAL9000.homeunix.com> <758430000.1039382013@leeloo.intern.geht.de> <20021208214357.GA945@HAL9000.homeunix.com> <794560000.1039386792@leeloo.intern.geht.de> <20021209001645.GA1618@HAL9000.homeunix.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[-- Attachment #1 --] > Yes, but Solaris 8 and glibc disagree about whether > _XOPEN_SOURCE_EXTENDED is required. As for FreeBSD, I think your > general complaint about it being too picky is invalid; everyone > else does things the same way, and standards even require that no My experience is that others do it a little bit different. (Thefore this thread..:)) Even FreeBSD 4.x does it different. > extra symbols are defined by standard headers unless otherwise IIRC then the standards says that no strictly conforming POSIX application should be broken my system extensions. It doesn't describe how the system should do that.. Regards, Marc "Premature optimization is the root of all evil." -- Donald E. Knuth [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE99FzY7YQCetAaG3MRAhd2AJ44K94/tNRxQfmgWucHu976O/JzyQCgisbF w0Hs+TWXa84gIuMTdEEiwAc= =nes5 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1004540000.1039424728>