Date: Wed, 21 Apr 1999 11:31:05 -0500 (CDT) From: Kevin Day <toasty@home.dragondata.com> To: bright@rush.net (Alfred Perlstein) Cc: dillon@apollo.backplane.com, rb@gid.co.uk, wilko@yedi.iaf.nl, current@FreeBSD.ORG, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Alright, who's the smart alleck that fixed NFS this last week? :) , WAS: Re: solid NFS patch #6 avail for -current - need tester Message-ID: <199904211631.LAA29863@home.dragondata.com> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.96.990421101558.11384i-100000@cygnus.rush.net> from Alfred Perlstein at "Apr 21, 1999 10:32:19 am"
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> yeah the clocks are not setup properly :) but otherwise i'm just > gonna say HOLY SH*T you fixed NFS! :) We all owe Matt big for this. :) > I'm using the default mount operations, as far as NFS server > not responding messages, i have no clue, but the server is still > up and i've seen that message happen when a lot of pressure is > being put on an NFS server even though everything is fine. Try mounting with -d... Can I make a guess that the NFS mount is going over 100MB ethernet? I have a strong theory that the dynamic retransmit timer needs rework for low latency connections, with high variability in their performance during high traffic. (lots of collisions) Kevin To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199904211631.LAA29863>