Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2026 18:19:42 +0100 From: Olivier Certner <olce@freebsd.org> To: Konstantin Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com> Cc: src-committers@freebsd.org, dev-commits-src-all@freebsd.org, dev-commits-src-main@freebsd.org Subject: Re: git: 67599eef01f5 - main - sys/x86/NOTES: Add vt_efifb Message-ID: <13231764.xkLNZX5ndW@ravel> In-Reply-To: <aWG5ZVSaAbMwpH0G@kib.kiev.ua> References: <69612e4a.3279b.9f58eba@gitrepo.freebsd.org> <aWG5ZVSaAbMwpH0G@kib.kiev.ua>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
[-- Attachment #1 --] > GENERIC + LINT should cover all options and reverse of them, as much as possible. In other words, LINT > should be complementary to GENERIC, for most options. Exercising options incompatible with those of GENERIC, yes. But just removing compatible options that are in GENERIC does not make much sense, and from various examples does not match existing practice. >From my perspective, the rules of thumb for NOTES/LINT is to document all options and increase compilation coverage as much as possible. -- Olivier Certner [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCQAdFiEEmNCxHjkosai0LYIujKEwQJceJicFAmliii4ACgkQjKEwQJce JiffGg/9FV/8I3RRhTDeFZgvvLK/NKttY1uNm6Un42fKymNJslEEJ7eAXtgKgb2x gg0jAnbZoDP1HsjTZsY3pDZ4llgPeFxHd5bsOtNrxCQ/O3KrLMVCdS2YlZaCVDnR 20hllNrh9bNsNxXtGbqZalDYo3nOjuq/Wb8z6PFU2yeMluc95yZ33TJihFczrBXb doTchiJnM+C9zVMTJp4w0laNQLEX4/WX4tF+SXpzfIPgTWvPM4dqlYNFDevRtM5p DuYwuCz4uJwmqgZsrdd+cEAinOAEJc+M7BuU6TBipNyRN/uW3YXI3DnHtr0QBmy1 zzpTtY1JMhl4ExHIgOS3Y4aCh39lq1ucpI9AbwsLFk9SdwxH0sS7srveApP9/BWR k7c6OM8QEBRYj31fPNhmWPCaKFWzvgYNHq237GEWdeQfHX/bpdk2ndwSrEi0iExK V4JO58D3ZSUxtW5q8bG7CoJiG8OmuGB/8babScKflmsl02KhKCYg2Upii1NfQBIG szy0XGnPey87F86obJFA5gg2y2Xa6cAnzADd3rVstKgNwfR5nbHMRUZbUPMjfd3N psdyWzsk7MZmGYHQr6pi4DOhxSOlTgltW2ZaMTMZuiCkBzs6vxoyJeSsEM/7PzK1 2obloqISScRSvDcmC1HXIW0WuUaCwPcPtTssnEiGrjfO5pP4Z5c= =eGXK -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----home | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?13231764.xkLNZX5ndW>