Date: Sun, 28 Mar 1999 11:59:58 -0700 From: Nate Williams <nate@mt.sri.com> To: Jun Kuriyama <kuriyama@sky.rim.or.jp> Cc: freebsd-mobile@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Which LAN PCCARD for FreeBSD (no PAO!) Message-ID: <199903281859.LAA08284@mt.sri.com> In-Reply-To: <36FDF5A7.417600CC@sky.rim.or.jp> References: <199903251636.RAA04214@greatoak.home> <199903270255.CAA28337@chandra.eatell.msr.prug.or.jp> <199903272106.OAA05479@mt.sri.com> <199903280328.MAA01166@rei.snipe.rim.or.jp> <36FDF5A7.417600CC@sky.rim.or.jp>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> Thread like this is repeated many times... We should clearify what is > problem about this. I don't like flames like this. This wasn't supposed to be a flame. It was a poor attempt at humour, which is why I added the smiley's. :) > Nate Williams wrote: > > No no no. You got it all wrong. PAO support is buggy, FreeBSD APM is > > good, and PCCARD support is limited. :) :) :) > > Nate, I think what you want to say about "PAO support is buggy" is an > approach for bus-architectural things and handling of kernel options. > > I think you didn't say "everything in PAO is not useful", right? I never said anything about PAO not being useful. Heck, I've recommended it to people who have hardware not support in FreeBSD. > We should re-hack PAO code to separate by functionallity. And let's > post -mobile and -current for reviewing. Agreed. :) Nate To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-mobile" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199903281859.LAA08284>