Date: Mon, 7 Oct 2024 09:29:22 -0700 From: Yuri Victorovich <yuri@freebsd.org> To: Gleb Popov <arrowd@freebsd.org> Cc: ports-committers@freebsd.org, dev-commits-ports-all@freebsd.org, dev-commits-ports-main@freebsd.org Subject: Re: git: 72a99dd00b86 - main - misc/onnxruntime: New port: Cross-platform, high performance ML inferencing & training accelerator Message-ID: <6f18c22a-a4c9-4370-a730-652d2eb05918@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <CALH631mQS5aTvafEGeBf6pNr5U0hunoZW4-1gJQ0ADQfgEtS=w@mail.gmail.com> References: <202410070855.4978tknf062709@gitrepo.freebsd.org> <CALH631mQS5aTvafEGeBf6pNr5U0hunoZW4-1gJQ0ADQfgEtS=w@mail.gmail.com>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
[-- Attachment #1 --] Hi Gleb, On 10/7/24 03:35, Gleb Popov wrote: > I don't think this is worth committing then. Especially given the > amount of ports you're already maintaining. > I believe that a few quality ports is better than many broken ones. Some important software depends on onnxruntime that would be desirable to have in the ports tree. Also one user specifically asked about onnxruntime this weekend. Missing symbols probably don't prevent some uses or all important uses. The upstream likely distributes static libs instead of shared libs for this reason, because static libs hide missing symbol problems and allow partial use. While somewhat problematic, it is a good stepping stone for a stable port in the future once they fix issues. > Can you please give attention to > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=280689 and > https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/dev-commits-ports-main/2024-October/124108.html > instead of piling up new ports of questionable usefulness? I will look into/fix these soon. Thanks, Yuri [-- Attachment #2 --] <!DOCTYPE html> <html> <head> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8"> </head> <body> <div class="moz-cite-prefix">Hi Gleb,<br> </div> <div class="moz-cite-prefix"><br> </div> <div class="moz-cite-prefix"><br> </div> <div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 10/7/24 03:35, Gleb Popov wrote:<br> </div> <blockquote type="cite" cite="mid:CALH631mQS5aTvafEGeBf6pNr5U0hunoZW4-1gJQ0ADQfgEtS=w@mail.gmail.com"> <pre>I don't think this is worth committing then. Especially given the amount of ports you're already maintaining. I believe that a few quality ports is better than many broken ones.</pre> </blockquote> <p>Some important software depends on onnxruntime that would</p> <p>be desirable to have in the ports tree. Also one user</p> <p>specifically asked about onnxruntime this weekend.</p> <p>Missing symbols probably don't prevent some uses or</p> <p>all important uses.</p> <p>The upstream likely distributes static libs instead of</p> <p>shared libs for this reason, because static libs hide</p> <p>missing symbol problems and allow partial use.</p> <p>While somewhat problematic, it is a good stepping stone</p> <p>for a stable port in the future once they fix issues.<br> </p> <p><br> </p> <blockquote type="cite" cite="mid:CALH631mQS5aTvafEGeBf6pNr5U0hunoZW4-1gJQ0ADQfgEtS=w@mail.gmail.com"> <pre>Can you please give attention to <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=280689" moz-do-not-send="true">https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=280689</a>; and <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/dev-commits-ports-main/2024-October/124108.html" moz-do-not-send="true">https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/dev-commits-ports-main/2024-October/124108.html</a>; instead of piling up new ports of questionable usefulness? </pre> </blockquote> <p><br> </p> <p>I will look into/fix these soon.</p> <p><br> </p> <p><br> </p> <p>Thanks,</p> <p>Yuri</p> <p><br> </p> </body> </html>home | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?6f18c22a-a4c9-4370-a730-652d2eb05918>