Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 27 Apr 2009 10:03:34 -0500
From:      "Rick C. Petty" <rick-freebsd2008@kiwi-computer.com>
To:        Rick Macklem <rmacklem@uoguelph.ca>
Cc:        freebsd-fs@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Why do some ufs i-node fields have 2 copies?
Message-ID:  <20090427150334.GA59796@keira.kiwi-computer.com>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.63.0904271049160.17193@muncher.cs.uoguelph.ca>
References:  <Pine.GSO.4.63.0904261651460.4478@muncher.cs.uoguelph.ca> <20090426210343.GA51829@keira.kiwi-computer.com> <Pine.GSO.4.63.0904261813260.16667@muncher.cs.uoguelph.ca> <20090427135200.GA59201@keira.kiwi-computer.com> <Pine.GSO.4.63.0904271049160.17193@muncher.cs.uoguelph.ca>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 10:58:43AM -0400, Rick Macklem wrote:
> 
> 
> Oops, poorly expressed. What I meant to say was "doesn't really add 
> anything to
> the line of code I listed in the original message":
> 
> 	DIP_SET(ip, i_modrev, DIP(ip, i_modrev) + 1);
> 
> since that is the only time i_modrev is manipulated. (I didn't mean "doesn't
> add anything to the code, in general".)

<snip>

> Does it make sense this time?

Yes, that makes total sense.

-- Rick C. Petty



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20090427150334.GA59796>