Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2001 23:32:36 +0300 From: Giorgos Keramidas <charon@labs.gr> To: Dima Dorfman <dima@unixfreak.org> Cc: freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: docs/30343: minor changes to ata(4) manpage Message-ID: <20010905233236.A5727@hades.hell.gr> In-Reply-To: <200109051930.f85JU2C06782@freefall.freebsd.org>; from dima@unixfreak.org on Wed, Sep 05, 2001 at 12:30:02PM -0700 References: <200109051930.f85JU2C06782@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Sep 05, 2001 at 12:30:02PM -0700, Dima Dorfman wrote: > > I don't see the reason behind this. This change just makes the manual > page inconsistent with itself (since it wouldn't describe how to > disable hw.ata.tags) and probably most others as well. > > Am I missing something? True. I did not read the manpage very very carefully, just noticed that I found that part a bit confusing. Perhaps I was too tired to understand it correctly. If it seems more proper, we can close this PR and let me read the manpage again. Then, if it's ok with Soren I could write up how the sysctl's are enabled and how they're disabled, and send diffs that change all of them and not only one. I feel that both enabling and disabling sysctl's should be explained, but consistency is more important. This seems to be necessary, since some of the sysctl's are not disabled when put to 0, while others are. So if it's ok to add text that explains disabling too for those sysctl's that do support it, I'll go through the text again. -giorgos To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-doc" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010905233236.A5727>