Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 29 Oct 2005 21:15:12 -0700
From:      Brooks Davis <brooks@one-eyed-alien.net>
To:        "Bruce A. Mah" <bmah@freebsd.org>
Cc:        cvs-ports@freebsd.org, Brooks Davis <brooks@freebsd.org>, cvs-all@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: cvs commit: ports/audio/slimserver Makefile distinfo
Message-ID:  <20051030041512.GA1275@odin.ac.hmc.edu>
In-Reply-To: <1130638561.8172.190.camel@tomcat.kitchenlab.org>
References:  <200510282021.j9SKLPGQ049426@repoman.freebsd.org> <1130638561.8172.190.camel@tomcat.kitchenlab.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

--2fHTh5uZTiUOsy+g
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Sat, Oct 29, 2005 at 07:16:01PM -0700, Bruce A. Mah wrote:
> If memory serves me right, Brooks Davis wrote:
> > brooks      2005-10-28 20:21:25 UTC
> >=20
> >   FreeBSD ports repository
> >=20
> >   Modified files:
> >     audio/slimserver     Makefile distinfo=20
> >   Log:
> >   Upgrade to slimserver 6.2.0.  New features include:
> >    - Built-in support WMA radio and files for all operating systems.
> >    - Wake-on-LAN function.
> >    - Seven day alarm.
> >    - Replay gain support.
> >  =20
> >   Revision  Changes    Path
> >   1.19      +1 -4      ports/audio/slimserver/Makefile
> >   1.10      +2 -2      ports/audio/slimserver/distinfo
>=20
> Thanks!
>=20
> So I actually had some problems with the server spontaneously dying for
> no reason I could fathom (I didn't know how to troubleshoot this).  I
> tried to do some research on the SlimDevices Web forums and discovered
> that 6.2.0 appears to have a reputation for being unstable, at least
> compared to 6.1.1.  It seems like the plan is to roll a 6.2.1 sometime
> "soon".
>=20
> (For myself, I downgraded to 6.1.1.  This seemed like the wisest thing
> to do late last night when I was messing with this stuff.)

I saw a report to that effect my self, but haven't seen this issue my
self.  I think there must be some sort of interaction going on for some
people and not others.

-- Brooks

--=20
Any statement of the form "X is the one, true Y" is FALSE.
PGP fingerprint 655D 519C 26A7 82E7 2529  9BF0 5D8E 8BE9 F238 1AD4

--2fHTh5uZTiUOsy+g
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFDZEjPXY6L6fI4GtQRAiRCAKDiH5I6o+znm5I7bIqKKGrJIsPwgwCfTY5o
ZAdW7vStXPrB8Tpto1UNaYw=
=CoPI
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--2fHTh5uZTiUOsy+g--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20051030041512.GA1275>