Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 18 Jun 2003 22:12:08 -0400 (EDT)
From:      Daniel Eischen <eischen@vigrid.com>
To:        Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>
Cc:        threads@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Removal of bogus gethostbyaddr_r()
Message-ID:  <Pine.GSO.4.10.10306182206300.3647-100000@pcnet5.pcnet.com>
In-Reply-To: <20030618210812.GB21622@rot13.obsecurity.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 18 Jun 2003, Kris Kennaway wrote:

> On Wed, Jun 18, 2003 at 08:59:23AM -0400, Daniel Eischen wrote:
> > On Wed, 18 Jun 2003, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> > 
> > > Any objections?
> > > 
> > > Kris
> > 
> > Why is this bogus?  Do we have another gethostbyaddr_r hiding
> > somewhere?
> 
> Nope, but this one isn't thread-safe, and it's not prototyped anywhere
> (see my mail to current from a few days ago).  We don't have any of
> the other getfoobybar_r functions either.

Well, I guess we should probably fix the prototype and make
it thread-safe, but if ports are failing because they pick it
up, then I don't have a problem with removing it.  What's
there is simple enough to add back once it has the correct
API and is really thread-safe.  My $.02.

-- 
Dan Eischen



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.GSO.4.10.10306182206300.3647-100000>