Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 27 Jun 2000 17:29:19 -0600
From:      Warner Losh <imp@village.org>
To:        Wes Peters <wes@softweyr.com>
Cc:        Nate Williams <nate@yogotech.com>, arch@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: Bringing LPRng into FreeBSD? 
Message-ID:  <200006272329.RAA50325@harmony.village.org>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 27 Jun 2000 17:04:39 MDT." <39593307.B752A758@softweyr.com> 
References:  <39593307.B752A758@softweyr.com>  <3958502D.DF9729BD@gorean.org> <200006242153.OAA01110@h4.private> <200006270615.AAA31842@harmony.village.org> <200006270725.BAA32822@harmony.village.org> <200006271418.IAA04077@nomad.yogotech.com> 

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <39593307.B752A758@softweyr.com> Wes Peters writes:
: If we continue to migrate important parts of FreeBSD to licenses more
: restrictive than the BSD license, we may find ourselves losing embedded
: design wins to other BSD systems.  If that's what the FreeBSD user base
: wants, so be it, but I suspect it is at odds with the wants and needs 
: of Whistle, Nokia, Apple (maybe), and BSDi (in particular).

While I am arguing about th Artistic license, I think you are right.

Warner


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200006272329.RAA50325>