Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2004 12:32:58 -0500 From: Joe Marcus Clarke <marcus@marcuscom.com> To: Oliver Eikemeier <eikemeier@fillmore-labs.com> Cc: ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: BROKEN vs. IGNORE [was: cvs commit: ports/devel/whups Makefile] Message-ID: <1079717578.780.7.camel@gyros> In-Reply-To: <405AC85C.1070001@fillmore-labs.com> References: <200402180350.i1I3oZtv045855@repoman.freebsd.org> <405AC85C.1070001@fillmore-labs.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--=-jKQ5bQoiCmgL4NN9zcxz Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, 2004-03-19 at 05:15, Oliver Eikemeier wrote: > Kris Kennaway wrote: >=20 > > kris 2004/02/17 19:50:35 PST > >=20 > > FreeBSD ports repository > >=20 > > Modified files: > > devel/whups Makefile=20 > > Log: > > Change BROKEN to IGNORE since the package still builds (but does not = work) >=20 > Are there any rules when to use BROKEN and when to use IGNORE? >=20 > <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/2004-March/010340.htm= l> Basically, ports marked BROKEN will attempted to be built by bento where as ports marked IGNORE will not be. If it's a transient build issue, mark it as BROKEN so that the errors will still show up on bento, and given people something to look at when fixing. However, if the port will _never_ build in a given environment, or builds but fails to run, then mark IGNORE. Joe --=20 PGP Key : http://www.marcuscom.com/pgp.asc --=-jKQ5bQoiCmgL4NN9zcxz Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBAWy7Kb2iPiv4Uz4cRAtbsAJ9TMkU2N8tSqyV4iMjm4CtkPXojWwCfeNKa bkyTCE/Ic4k6mLk41UZljnA= =Sq/Y -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-jKQ5bQoiCmgL4NN9zcxz--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1079717578.780.7.camel>