Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2007 12:55:12 -0700 From: "David O'Brien" <obrien@freebsd.org> To: Daniel Eischen <deischen@freebsd.org> Cc: src-committers@freebsd.org, John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org>, cvs-src@freebsd.org, cvs-all@freebsd.org, Ruslan Ermilov <ru@freebsd.org>, Dag-Erling =?unknown-8bit?B?U23DuHJncmF2?= <des@des.no> Subject: Re: cvs commit: src Makefile.inc1 UPDATING src/cddl/lib Makefile src/cddl/usr.bin Makefile src/cddl/usr.sbin Makefile src/lib Makefile src/lib/libkse Makefile kse.map pthread.map src/lib/libkse/arch/amd64 Makefile.inc src/lib/libkse/arch/amd64/amd64 ... Message-ID: <20071011195512.GC46899@dragon.NUXI.org> In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.64.0710111545020.16311@sea.ntplx.net> References: <200710091342.l99DgZDB097501@repoman.freebsd.org> <20071011085836.GC14241@team.vega.ru> <20071011172823.GB43603@dragon.NUXI.org> <200710111422.44320.jhb@freebsd.org> <20071011193914.GA46899@dragon.NUXI.org> <Pine.GSO.4.64.0710111545020.16311@sea.ntplx.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Oct 11, 2007 at 03:47:24PM -0400, Daniel Eischen wrote: > Whatever happened to renumbering all symbol versioned libraries > to libfoo.0? Or even libfoo.0.0. The whole point of symbol > versioning is that we don't need to bump library versions > for ABI breakage. That's what I'd like to see happen (so.0 => symboled lib). Ken felt it was too be late to do for 7.0. But if we do it for 8.0, we'd have to have a compat7x port which put symlinks in place. So the upgrade path is a little rougher than we should have for symboled libs. Thus we won't get the symboled libs done painlessly right. -- -- David (obrien@FreeBSD.org)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20071011195512.GC46899>