Date: Tue, 5 Jan 1999 17:32:01 -0500 From: Nathan Dorfman <nathan@rtfm.net> To: "Kenneth D. Merry" <ken@plutotech.com>, Mike Smith <mike@smith.net.au> Cc: luigi@labinfo.iet.unipi.it, committers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: proposed atapi-cd patch Message-ID: <19990105173201.B21538@rtfm.net> In-Reply-To: <199901042346.QAA60358@panzer.plutotech.com>; from Kenneth D. Merry on Mon, Jan 04, 1999 at 04:46:24PM -0700 References: <199901042207.OAA00788@dingo.cdrom.com> <199901042346.QAA60358@panzer.plutotech.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Jan 04, 1999 at 04:46:24PM -0700, Kenneth D. Merry wrote: > I think it might be easier if the cd9660 code could handle the track offset > stuff. I've never actually tried this, but is there anything restricting a data track from being anything other than an ISO9660 filesystem? E.g. UFS track, dump or tgz track, etc. If not, putting this track offset code in cd9660 would be a little limiting, no? > Ken > -- > Kenneth Merry > ken@plutotech.com -- ________________ _____________________________________________ / Nathan Dorfman \ / "`IE4 brings the web to UNIX'? *laugh* Isn't / nathan@rtfm.net \/ that similar to Ronald McDonald bringing / finger for PGP key \ religion to the pope?" -Jamie Bowden To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19990105173201.B21538>