Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 08 Jun 2021 00:39:55 -0700
From:      Chris <bsd-lists@bsdforge.com>
To:        Dewayne Geraghty <dewayne@heuristicsystems.com.au>
Cc:        Dave Hayes <dave@jetcafe.org>, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Where might memory be reported?
Message-ID:  <7a70082c6e7e8f948e5c6f92c70174fc@bsdforge.com>
In-Reply-To: <bba08248-f898-cead-8df5-a52b1e14257a@heuristicsystems.com.au>
References:  <20210606160913.167e6c0a@bigus.dream-tech.com> <20210607115334.6e9d1178@bigus.dream-tech.com> <6c174c830019d133fbb4daefe442fb40@bsdforge.com> <bba08248-f898-cead-8df5-a52b1e14257a@heuristicsystems.com.au>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 2021-06-07 22:58, Dewayne Geraghty wrote:
> This issue was raised in April '21 by Andriy Gapon title "stable/13, vm
> page counts do not add up".
> 
> This was mentioned
> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=253281
> though its probably more of an affirmation of a symptom. (reminder to
> adjust status)
> 
> More relevant is
> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234559
> where Mark Johnson advised (in Feb '19)
> "I've thought about this some more and decided to close this bug WONTFIX
> for now.  Basically, we started lazily dequeuing wired pages to avoid
> the page queue synchronization cost incurred by frequent wirings.  The
> result is that wired pages may temporarily be counted as
> active/inactive/laundry despite not being reclaimable.  Maintaining the
> previous behaviour wrt statistics would introduce synchronization
> overhead that we've been trying to avoid in past and future work.  I
> don't plan to change the current behaviour and there doesn't seem to be
> a compelling reason to do so, at least based on this report.  If you or
> anyone else would like to discuss this further or describe a use-case
> that depends on the old behaviour, please feel free to re-open the bug."
tl;dr
I recognize this needs work. But it's a GREAT DEAL of work, and I currently
have much shinier things on my to-do list. ;-)

No offense to Mark. He's doing a tremendous job. I just couldn't resist. :-)

--Chris
> 
> I hope I've shed some light on the current situation, unfortunately not
> in its resolution.
> Regards, Dewayne.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?7a70082c6e7e8f948e5c6f92c70174fc>