Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 29 Jan 2019 08:56:33 -0800
From:      Enji Cooper <yaneurabeya@gmail.com>
To:        Kyle Evans <kevans@freebsd.org>
Cc:        src-committers <src-committers@freebsd.org>, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, svn-src-head@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: svn commit: r343543 - head/sbin/bectl/tests
Message-ID:  <75B5E02D-7BE6-4D6F-BF7A-241E7CF16A5E@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <5687EE07-74FB-4233-B51D-C8948641E8CB@gmail.com>
References:  <201901290408.x0T48oJQ080243@repo.freebsd.org> <CACNAnaEmeQLwB%2Ba8KWyqB3GFWDn7on4gYtDrH7i5G6mj3zfSJw@mail.gmail.com> <674E01AB-49C7-4B40-B2FD-6EB4AFEAB1FD@gmail.com> <CACNAnaH5Qnfzenkwe1obM0DOfUZbvTjWg79o7FAobPrT6WYcaA@mail.gmail.com> <5687EE07-74FB-4233-B51D-C8948641E8CB@gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help


> On Jan 29, 2019, at 08:55, Enji Cooper <yaneurabeya@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> 
>>> On Jan 29, 2019, at 08:39, Kyle Evans <kevans@freebsd.org> wrote:
>>> 
>>> On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 10:32 AM Enji Cooper <yaneurabeya@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> 
>>>>> On Jan 28, 2019, at 20:10, Kyle Evans <kevans@freebsd.org> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> On Mon, Jan 28, 2019 at 10:09 PM Kyle Evans <kevans@freebsd.org> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> Author: kevans
>>>>> Date: Tue Jan 29 04:08:49 2019
>>>>> New Revision: 343543
>>>>> URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/343543
>>>>> 
>>>>> Log:
>>>>> bectl(8) test: Force destroy the zpool in cleanup
>>>>> 
>>>>> This is a wild guess as to why bectl tests failed once upon a time in CI,
>>>>> given no apparent way to see a transcript of cleanup routines with Kyua. The
>>>>> bectl tests construct a new, clean zpool for every test. The failure
>>>>> indicated was because of a mount that was leftover from a previous test, but
>>>>> the previous test had succeeded so it's not clear how the mount remained
>>>>> leftover unless the `zpool get health ${pool}` had somehow failed.
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> I left out: the tests are supposed to be constructed to clean up any
>>>> mounts that were left over in the course of the test, hence the
>>>> assumption that the failure lies in the cleanup.
>>> 
>>> Hi Kyle,
>>> 
>>> The tests use a deterministic zpool name defined locally (not globally), and will only destroy the zpool if “zpool get health” succeeds.
>>> 
>>> The tests will work the first time (when the zpool doesn’t exist), but I believe they’re actually introducing nondeterminism by accident. I will propose a fix for this.
>>> 
>>> There’s a way to decipher why things failed from /var/log/messages and kyua output. It’s just nontrivial to those who don’t know what to look for. Can you please provide a failing ci run?
>>> 
>> 
>> Hi,
>> 
>> Thanks! Any help is appreciated -- my inquiry to -testing@ in response
>> to the weekly report where the failing test [1] was mentioned has been
>> met with silence. The failure is consistent in the i386-test job, but
>> amd64-test sees nothing of the sort (and neither does my local
>> testing).
> 
> Thanks for the reminder to rejoin that list.
> 
>> [1] https://ci.freebsd.org/job/FreeBSD-stable-12-i386-test/426/testReport/sbin.bectl/bectl_test/bectl_mount/
> 
> It’s pretty obvious from the above run what’s going on from the output. A similarly named zpool (same prefix; suffixed with a 2) is being matched by grep, even though the test sets up one with a suffix in the preceding steps.

*without a suffix. My bad.


Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?75B5E02D-7BE6-4D6F-BF7A-241E7CF16A5E>