Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2004 04:53:13 +0100 From: Doug Barton <DougB@DougBarton.net> To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: BIND build knobs Message-ID: <41563D29.5080406@DougBarton.net> In-Reply-To: <20040926024903.GB2530@dragon.nuxi.com> References: <200409241342.i8ODg06a030839@repoman.freebsd.org> <20040924164730.GA4259@xor.obsecurity.org> <41545194.1030700@DougBarton.net> <Pine.BSF.4.53.0409241811490.93902@e0-0.zab2.int.zabbadoz.net> <20040924210405.A6066@URF.trarfvf> <20040926024903.GB2530@dragon.nuxi.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
David O'Brien wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 24, 2004 at 09:33:22PM +0100, Doug Barton wrote:
>
>>The goal here is to make the NO_BIND option a lot more granular, and to
>>default some of the options to not install bits unless they are
>>specifically requested. The knob for the libs is the first step in the
>>latter direction.
>>
>>The other knobs I have in mind are as follows:
>>
>>#NO_BIND_DNSSEC= true # dnssec-{keygen|signzone}
>>#NO_BIND_LWRESD= true # lwresd
>>#NO_BIND_NAMED= true # named, named-check{conf|zone},
>>rndc[-confgen]
>>#NO_BIND_UTILS= true # dig, host, nslookup, nsupdate
>
>
> I assume "NO_BIND" will still imply all the above?
>
Yes ... the example make.conf and man page have already been updated in
that regard. :)
--
If you're never wrong, you're not trying hard enough
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?41563D29.5080406>