Date: Mon, 09 Aug 2004 17:50:49 -0500 From: Chris <racerx@makeworld.com> To: FreeBSD - Chat <freebsd-chat@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: 5.3R Schedule Message-ID: <4117FFC9.7050505@makeworld.com> In-Reply-To: <20040809224436.GC750@zaphod.nitro.dk> References: <41179955.5020508@makeworld.com> <xzp8ycoqa0m.fsf@dwp.des.no> <4117FB52.4050504@makeworld.com> <20040809224436.GC750@zaphod.nitro.dk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Simon L. Nielsen wrote: > On 2004.08.09 17:31:46 -0500, Chris wrote: > >>Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote: >> >>>Chris <racerx@makeworld.com> writes: >>> >>> >>>>http://www.freebsd.org/releases/5.3R/schedule.html >>>> >>>>However, 4.11???? Now that's some wild numbering. Perhaps it should >>>>have been: >>>> >>>>4.9, 4.9.1, and now maybe 4.9.1.1 or 4.9.11 or 4.9.1.2 - who knows. >>> >>> >>>Excuse me? The latest release from the RELENG_4 branch was 4.10, and >>>the next will be 4.11. >>> >>>DES >> >>I was pointing out that yes - there is going to be a 4.11. Perhaps I >>should have articulated it. The version numbering scheme is odd. >> >>For example, there is a 5.2 and a 5.2.1 > > > I think the reason you think it is odd is that you don't see the > different between a x.y and a x.y.z release. See > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/releng/release-proc.html > for an overview of the 4.X/5.X release history. This is also > discussed extensivly in the mailing list archives. > Oh for fucks sakes - I made a comment in a list entitled "chat" Nothing technical or for that matter, pertinent. To discuss things related to the OS etc. Unbind yer panties ladies. -- Best regards, Chris
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4117FFC9.7050505>