Date: Wed, 18 Aug 1999 22:53:13 -0400 From: Tim Vanderhoek <vanderh@ecf.utoronto.ca> To: Nik Clayton <nik@freebsd.org> Cc: doc@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Default FDP docs installation directory? Message-ID: <19990818225313.C20849@ppp18344.on.bellglobal.com> In-Reply-To: <19990819005735.C83680@catkin.nothing-going-on.org>; from Nik Clayton on Thu, Aug 19, 1999 at 12:57:35AM %2B0100 References: <19990818121931.A4266@kilt.nothing-going-on.org> <vqcr9l0eol7.fsf@silvia.hip.berkeley.edu> <19990819005735.C83680@catkin.nothing-going-on.org>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
On Thu, Aug 19, 1999 at 12:57:35AM +0100, Nik Clayton wrote:
>
> that you're going to
> be seeing documentation put together by the FreeBSD Documentation Project.
>
> Which is why I think some variation on /usr/share/doc/fdp/ or
> /usr/local/share/doc/fdp/ is appropriate. The FDP documentation is then
> kept separate from documentation that is not maintained by the FDP.
FWIW: I agree with the chorus: a) /usr/local is not needed for packages
to work
b) /usr/share/doc implicitly means that
the documentation is put together by the
FreeBSD Documentation Project (since
FreeBSD it otherwise generally incapable
of producing documentation :-)
There doesn't seem to be a good reason to violate POLA here.
> That will lead to /usr/share/doc/en_US.ISO_8859-1/
> es_ES.ISO_8859-1/
> ja/
> papers/
> psd/
> ru_RU.KOI8-R
> smm/
> usd/
> zh_TW.Big/
Only for people who install all of en, es, ja, ru, and zh. :)
Perhaps one day it may even move to /usr/share/doc-en_US.ISO_8859-1/,
and so on, since the doc subdir would ideally contain only one entry
(minus symlinks): es_ES.iso_8859-1/ (or whatever the local language
is)?
--
This is my .signature which gets appended to the end of my messages.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-doc" in the body of the message
home |
help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19990818225313.C20849>