Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2004 18:28:22 -0600 (MDT) From: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com> To: dave@horsfall.org Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Is 4.10-BETA stable? Message-ID: <20040422.182822.00816866.imp@bsdimp.com> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSI.4.58.0404221649040.8333@dave.horsfall.org> References: <Pine.BSI.4.58.0404221649040.8333@dave.horsfall.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message: <Pine.BSI.4.58.0404221649040.8333@dave.horsfall.org>
Dave Horsfall <dave@horsfall.org> writes:
: Well, imagine my dismay when I was greeted with 4.10-BETA instead...
It appears that re changed the way they are tagging releases again.
The last time we had 4.x-BETA was 4.2. A review of the cvs log for
the newvers.sh file shows that 5.1 and 5.2 had a BETA release, but all
other 4.x releases since 4.3 went through the sequence
4.x-STABLE -> 4.x+1-PRERELEASE -> 4.x+1-RC -> 4.x+1-STABLE
You'll have to ask re@ why this wasn't done this time.
Warner
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040422.182822.00816866.imp>