Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2012 01:40:48 -0800 From: Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org> To: Alfred Perlstein <bright@mu.org> Cc: "freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org" <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>, Dieter BSD <dieterbsd@engineer.com> Subject: Re: Memory reserves or lack thereof Message-ID: <CAJ-VmomvFQ%2B2%2BaKu4Eft1tX=OptVBAWjBqB99pD48TJKXex=ag@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <2CB113BD-D223-4BCF-AAB8-F3D3FA962168@mu.org> References: <20121112003215.238950@gmx.com> <2CB113BD-D223-4BCF-AAB8-F3D3FA962168@mu.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 11 November 2012 20:24, Alfred Perlstein <bright@mu.org> wrote: > I think very few of the m_nowaits actually need the reserve behavior. We should probably switch away from it digging that deep by default and introduce a flag and/or a per thread flag to set the behavior. There's already a perfectly fine flag - M_WAITOK. Just don't hold any locks, right? :) Adrian
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAJ-VmomvFQ%2B2%2BaKu4Eft1tX=OptVBAWjBqB99pD48TJKXex=ag>