Date: Mon, 8 Feb 2016 03:24:35 +1100 (EST) From: Ian Smith <smithi@nimnet.asn.au> To: Christoph Brinkhaus <c.brinkhaus@t-online.de> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn revision in uname Message-ID: <20160208024820.K51785@sola.nimnet.asn.au> In-Reply-To: <20160207153505.GA1420@esprimo.local> References: <20160207223554.P51785@sola.nimnet.asn.au> <56B73E8C.5060501@FreeBSD.org> <20160207153505.GA1420@esprimo.local>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, 7 Feb 2016 16:35:05 +0100, Christoph Brinkhaus wrote: > On Sun, Feb 07, 2016 at 12:54:36PM +0000, Matthew Seaman wrote: > > On 07/02/2016 12:11, Ian Smith wrote: > > > I've been using svnup for source updates for ages, and for my occasional > > > use it works fine. However one thing you don't get is the svn revision > > > shown in uname, eg % uname -vm > > > FreeBSD 9.3-STABLE #0: Thu Oct 29 03:18:26 EST 2015 > > > root@x200.smithi.id.au:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 > > % svnversion /usr/src > > 295073M > > > > If that fails, it will try running svnliteversion, and then cycle > > through various different ways of extracting a version string from other > > VCSes until it gets a result. > > The version svnlite is part of the system and > does not need to be installed separately. On 10.x - since 10.1 maybe? - but not on 9.x. > Here svnliteversion /usr/src works. If you're pulling sources with svnlite, so it should :) Conversion between using svn and svnup, either way, requires some care and cleaning up; generally best advice is not to try mixing these methods. cheers, Ian
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20160208024820.K51785>