Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2017 20:21:22 -0400 From: Ernie Luzar <luzar722@gmail.com> To: "Igor R." <freebsd@str.komkon.org> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: command line history broken in 11.0 Message-ID: <58D1C382.9090306@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <alpine.BSF.2.20.1703211656530.12389@tissa.komkon.org> References: <alpine.BSF.2.20.1703211310410.12389@tissa.komkon.org> <58D1925B.8050500@gmail.com> <alpine.BSF.2.20.1703211656530.12389@tissa.komkon.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Igor R. wrote: > > > Ernie, > > You assertion about -o option sounds reasonable. > I didn't think through if it is consistent with the changes made between > the versions, and I didn't check the earlier history of changes (which > would make your aliases+history working in 10.x) of the code. > > But the changes between 10.3 and 11.0 were indeed related to signal vs > fork, which would be in the right ballpark with what the option -o does, > according to the man pages. > > By the way, - I am still curious if sending halt or reboot into > background would also do what you wanted. If you have a box you can > experiment with, - would you mind doing that? > > snip > I do have a dev box at this time. That is where I did the testing about this problem. I just tried "reboot & ; exit" and it did indeed work.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?58D1C382.9090306>