Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 19 Apr 2001 13:27:47 -0500
From:      Mike Meyer <mwm@mired.org>
To:        Brett Glass <brett@lariat.org>
Cc:        Mike Meyer <mwm@mired.org>, Jamie Bowden <ragnar@sysabend.org>, James Howard <howardjp@well.com>, Rahul Siddharthan <rsidd@physics.iisc.ernet.in>, Joseph Mallett <jmallett@newgold.net>, chat@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: banner(6)
Message-ID:  <15071.11811.739901.773677@guru.mired.org>
In-Reply-To: <4.3.2.7.2.20010419120132.0442a560@localhost>
References:  <4.3.2.7.2.20010419092019.04484770@localhost> <Pine.BSF.4.10.10104181512060.71134-100000@moo.sysabend.org> <Pine.GSO.4.21.0104180641460.517-100000@well.com> <4.3.2.7.2.20010419120132.0442a560@localhost>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

Brett Glass <brett@lariat.org> types:
> >You are answering a question that I didn't ask you, and wasn't
> >directed at you.
> I'm responding to an incorrect assertion about something I said
> (or, rather, didn't say).

Oh? What was the assertion? You quoted a question asked of someone
else, then claimed you hadn't said any such thing. No one ever claimed
you had said any such thing.

> >So the non-scalable bitmaps that uses to display characters should be
> >called a "typeface"? Since they are also digital, wouldn't "digital
> >typeface" also be correct?
> Technically, these are fonts because they are already rendered. You
> may find these included with a digital typeface, though only 
> occasionally.

In which case, a scalable font is a font because it's a rendering of
the typeface.

> >You're not refuting what I said, you're quibbling about the
> >terminology. 
> I'm not "quibbling" about terminology. I'm describing the
> correct use of the terms.

Now you're quibbling about the meaning of quibbling. You haven't
provided anything that even *remotely* looks like correct use of the
terms; you've merely made assertions without providing any reasons,
while ignoring the reasons I've provided for the common useage being
correct.

Since that seems to be the endpoint of *any* discussion with you, I'm
not going to bother replying to another round of quibbling.

	<mike
--
Mike Meyer <mwm@mired.org>			http://www.mired.org/home/mwm/
Independent WWW/Perforce/FreeBSD/Unix consultant, email for more information.

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?15071.11811.739901.773677>