Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2002 10:42:11 -0700 (MST) From: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@village.org> To: bts@babbleon.org Cc: freebsd-mobile@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ACPI Message-ID: <20020114.104211.26545398.imp@village.org> In-Reply-To: <0480b1828140e12FE8@mail8.nc.rr.com> References: <009001c19ce8$edd883e0$2603fb93@kloboucek> <0480b1828140e12FE8@mail8.nc.rr.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message: <0480b1828140e12FE8@mail8.nc.rr.com>
"Brian T. Schellenberger" <bts@babbleon.org> writes:
: I'd think it's "less interesting" because APM can report battery state and
: suspend and all that basic stuff. Or is the concern here about about
: machines with broken APM?
Lots of new laptops just flat won't work with APM. I have one that
just kicks up its heels and refuses to do a thing with APM. Of course
this is the same laptop that assigns IRQs to the cardbus bridge that
aren't wired to the cardbus bridge, but I suppose I can't exect things
like that to work right, can I?
Warner
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-mobile" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020114.104211.26545398.imp>