Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 18 Sep 2012 14:13:41 +0100
From:      Arthur Chance <freebsd@qeng-ho.org>
To:        Michael Sierchio <kudzu@tenebras.com>
Cc:        freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: What replaces csup?
Message-ID:  <50587385.6030806@qeng-ho.org>
In-Reply-To: <CAHu1Y70vLTQaGLQd_S65cyQe6RErgXJg2iy9VUDr9z6xXKwqyQ@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <D97788AE24B7FFB0C79AA6FB@localhost> <k38bct$ang$1@ger.gmane.org> <780066C6E2FAB67A997876B7@Pauls-MacBook-Pro.local> <20567.50041.903201.979498@jerusalem.litteratus.org> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1209172102400.26215@wonkity.com> <75ca1e92e2a51857615e193434898bf5@homey.local> <CAHu1Y70vLTQaGLQd_S65cyQe6RErgXJg2iy9VUDr9z6xXKwqyQ@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 09/18/12 13:00, Michael Sierchio wrote:
> We are really behind the curve here.  Git assumes (correctly) that
> disk space is inexpensive, much cheaper per byte than network
> bandwidth.  By the time we adopt SVN completely, every serious project
> I know of will have moved from subversion to git. ;-)

It's worth reading this

http://wiki.freebsd.org/GitDrawbacks




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?50587385.6030806>