Date: Wed, 28 Jun 1995 10:20:34 -0700 (PDT) From: "Rodney W. Grimes" <rgrimes@gndrsh.aac.dev.com> To: wollman@halloran-eldar.lcs.mit.edu (Garrett Wollman) Cc: robin@intercore.com, FreeBSD-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Paul Richards: sysconfig routed setting Message-ID: <199506281720.KAA09888@gndrsh.aac.dev.com> In-Reply-To: <9506281630.AA01016@halloran-eldar.lcs.mit.edu> from "Garrett Wollman" at Jun 28, 95 12:30:14 pm
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > <<On Wed, 28 Jun 1995 12:15:50 -0400 (EDT), Robin Cutshaw <robin@intercore.com> said: > > > I've got several routers on a network and > > several routers one or two networks deep so I prefer to send packets > > (that my host originates) to the appropriate router. > > There is a protocol for router discovery that someone (I think Paul > Traina) imported an implementation of. Unfortunately, the code is not > in a compilable state, and nobody appears to have touched it since it > was imported. This is the right solution to your concern. Okay, great, when this works and can fully replace what routed -q does, I am all for it!! But until THEN, nothing is going to convince me that we should change the current default of routed -q. > > > You could argue that I should use a default and suffer from either > > slower throughput or redirects but I would argue that this is > > inadequate. > > Nonetheless, it is the way the Internet architecture (second edition) > was designed. And you think that CSRG screwed up??? WTF is going on, we are going backwards!!! -- Rod Grimes rgrimes@gndrsh.aac.dev.com Accurate Automation Company Reliable computers for FreeBSD
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199506281720.KAA09888>