Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2001 21:12:43 -0700 From: Sean Chittenden <sean-freebsd-isp@chittenden.org> To: Tom Samplonius <tom@sdf.com> Cc: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Subject: Re: djbdns or tinydns Message-ID: <20010402211243.E53081@rand.tgd.net> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.05.10104022040580.9515-100000@misery.sdf.com>; from "tom@sdf.com" on Mon, Apr 02, 2001 at = 08:43:21PM References: <009601c0bbab$f0e0f410$fe78a8c0@espe.de> <Pine.BSF.4.05.10104022040580.9515-100000@misery.sdf.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--10jrOL3x2xqLmOsH Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable This sounds like a kernel limit and not a dnscache limit as I've run sites that were doing more than 200 requests per second and never saw any problems.... have you tweaked your kernel at all? -sc > On Mon, 2 Apr 2001, Clemens Hermann wrote: >=20 > > Hi Sean and John, > >=20 > > > I've had extremely favorable experiences with djbdns. > >=20 > > same with me. > >=20 > > - Simple setup > > - clean structure > > - rock-solid > > - ressource-friendly >=20 > I'm not completely happy with dnscache. Apparently, dnscache has a > hard-coded 200 request limit. I'm hitting that limit now, and it is not > clear on how to remove this limit. This is only something that you are > likely to see on large external caches. >=20 >=20 > Tom --=20 Sean Chittenden --10jrOL3x2xqLmOsH Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Comment: Sean Chittenden <sean@chittenden.org> iEYEARECAAYFAjrJTbsACgkQn09c7x7d+q3YpACeP/xnrwTw81gTLBgizX3oDVbC G/kAmwb0RTKdk1hJ9FG3CD0Q2fvIn7IX =x0v+ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --10jrOL3x2xqLmOsH-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010402211243.E53081>