Date: Fri, 6 Oct 2006 17:49:48 +0900 From: "Takahiro Kurosawa" <takahiro.kurosawa@gmail.com> To: "Alexander Kabaev" <kabaev@gmail.com> Cc: John Baldwin <john@baldwin.cx>, freebsd-gnats-submit@freebsd.org, freebsd-threads@freebsd.org Subject: Re: threads/103975: Implicit loading/unloading of libpthread.so may crash user processes Message-ID: <b72f377d0610060149id3d02dcxf5ccafe0e80fa18c@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20061005194756.07580108@kan.dnsalias.net> References: <200610041356.k94DuOmj097237@www.freebsd.org> <200610050906.21304.john@baldwin.cx> <20061005194756.07580108@kan.dnsalias.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Alexander Kabaev <kabaev@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, 5 Oct 2006 09:06:20 -0400 > John Baldwin <john@baldwin.cx> wrote: > > > > To fix the problem, a function that has __attribute__((destructor)) > > > in libpthread should probably be implemented in order to recover > > > the initial state before unloading. > > > > I'm not sure you can recover the state actually, hence why I think > > maybe we should make it so that libpthread doesn't unload once it has > > been loaded. I understand that it's way easier to prohibit unloading of libpthread than to change the code safely unloadable. Thanks for your explanation, John! > Linux does not allow pthread library to be unloaded presumably because > of reasons like this. From readelf -a /compat/linux/lib/libpthread.so.0: > > 0x6ffffffb (FLAGS_1) Flags: NODELETE INITFIRST > > Infortunately, rtld does not implement NODELETE and INITFIRST. Both are > addressed in my patch that I am yet to commit. I'm looking forward to the commit of your patch into the CVS repository :-) Maybe the following line should be added to src/lib/libpthread/Makefile when rtld supports the NODELETE flag? : LDFLAGS+=-Wl,-znodelete Thanks, -- KUROSAWA, Takahiro
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?b72f377d0610060149id3d02dcxf5ccafe0e80fa18c>