Date: Wed, 30 May 2012 15:02:41 +0200 From: Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@FreeBSD.org> To: "John D. Hendrickson and Sara Darnell" <johnandsara2@cox.net> Cc: arch@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: switch tounconditionnal boostrapping while to build the tree Message-ID: <20120530130241.GH9952@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> In-Reply-To: <4FC60E8C.1070204@cox.net> References: <20120526235510.GB90668@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> <4FC60E8C.1070204@cox.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--+Z7/5fzWRHDJ0o7Q Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 08:11:56AM -0400, John D. Hendrickson and Sara Darn= ell wrote: > i find the statements hard to believe >=20 > why are you doing it that way ? (using a broken yacc) It is not a broken yacc. the yacc import just revealed another problem whic= h is boostrap tools may needs to be always boostraped (which makes sense if you really want to support cross-compilation from nearly anywhere. > why do you believe it's ok to change previous releases that don't use tha= t yacc ? To build able to build them on a system that do not have the yacc version t= hey need, that system could be linux for example or it could be a recent head regards, Bapt --+Z7/5fzWRHDJ0o7Q Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAk/GGnEACgkQ8kTtMUmk6EwUGQCgldam/3Nt535vMIi9DcHoGy9S q58An0ztuebkuqaVYDn0bTZ19KoPXiFu =ZpeD -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --+Z7/5fzWRHDJ0o7Q--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20120530130241.GH9952>