Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 24 Apr 2007 19:43:25 +0200
From:      "Simon L. Nielsen" <simon@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Max Laier <max@love2party.net>
Cc:        "George V. Neville-Neil" <gnn@freebsd.org>, src-committers@freebsd.org, cvs-all@freebsd.org, cvs-src@freebsd.org, Kevin Oberman <oberman@es.net>
Subject:   Re: cvs commit: src/sys/netinet6 in6.h in6_proto.c route6.c
Message-ID:  <20070424174324.GA1011@zaphod.nitro.dk>
In-Reply-To: <200704241847.13056.max@love2party.net>
References:  <20070424155910.266924509A@ptavv.es.net> <200704241847.13056.max@love2party.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 2007.04.24 18:47:05 +0200, Max Laier wrote:
> On Tuesday 24 April 2007 17:59, Kevin Oberman wrote:
> > > From: "George V. Neville-Neil" <gnn@FreeBSD.org>
> > > Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 11:42:42 +0000 (UTC)
> > > Sender: owner-cvs-all@freebsd.org
> > >
> > > gnn         2007-04-24 11:42:42 UTC
> > >
> > >   FreeBSD src repository
> > >
> > >   Modified files:        (Branch: RELENG_6)
> > >     sys/netinet6         in6.h in6_proto.c route6.c
> > >   Log:
> > >   Add a new sysctl net.inet.ip6.rthdr0_allowed, which is default off,
> > >   to disable the processing of Route Header Type 0 options in IPv6.
> > >   This is not really an MFC because currently in HEAD the processing
> > >   of these options is disabled unilateraly pending discussion at the
> > > IETF on the future of such headers.
> > >
> > >   Suggested By: itojun
> > >   Reviewed By: jinmei
> > >
> > >   Revision  Changes    Path
> > >   1.36.2.8  +2 -1      src/sys/netinet6/in6.h
> > >   1.32.2.6  +5 -0      src/sys/netinet6/in6_proto.c
> > >   1.11.2.2  +4 -0      src/sys/netinet6/route6.c
> >
> > George,
> >
> > Can you "MTC" this so we can turn off and on RH0 processing on current
> > systems? It would greatly simplify things for me if I didn't have to
> > build two kernels and move back and forth to test things.
> 
> +1 ... also is this going to be in the supported RELENG_X_Y branches as 
> well?

Yes, once the foodwork required is done.

-- 
Simon L. Nielsen
Hat: FreeBSD Security Team



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20070424174324.GA1011>