To: Chris <bsd-lists@bsdforge.com> Cc: Ronald Klop <ronald-lists@klop.ws>, current@freebsd.org, pkgbase@freebsd.org Subject: Re: should FreeBSD-dhclient depend on FreeBSD-resolvconf? Message-ID: <aPHc1b8EEediL-zT@amaryllis.le-fay.org> In-Reply-To: <1dab51ef73837d98d5b5c36ef1e39118@bsdforge.com> References: <324231230.147694.1760527890049@localhost> <aO-QglIdge2VetmF@amaryllis.le-fay.org> <1dab51ef73837d98d5b5c36ef1e39118@bsdforge.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--z8A0Ujibr1GpqVY4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Chris wrote in <1dab51ef73837d98d5b5c36ef1e39118@bsdforge.com>: > On 2025-10-15 05:16, Lexi Winter wrote: > > so if dhclient use in jails is widespread, we should probably > > add it to minimal-jail. > IMHO isn't the HOST responsible for routing? Doesn't that make dhclient > and friends somewhat unusual (not average jail(8) setup?). no, in VNET jails the jail does routing itself, including IP address assignment. while i personally prefer to do this statically, i believe it's fairly common to use DHCP (for IPv4) or SLAAC (for IPv6) to handle this automatically, especially in mass-hosting setups. since dhclient is fairly small (150kB) and DHCP is something people typically expect to "just work", i am leaning on the side of putting this into minimal-jail unless anyone has a strong objection. --z8A0Ujibr1GpqVY4 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iHUEABYKAB0WIQSyjTg96lp3RifySyn1nT63mIK/YAUCaPHc1QAKCRD1nT63mIK/ YBVEAP0QoFw8WEicvpaaDVc5S2qQxK9r4bJTnmfElNo2rAdwKgD8Ctftytn2y+Kg IvTkDXo5q6O4DnQkUKyYuZ5/WVBzlw0= =vH5v -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --z8A0Ujibr1GpqVY4--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?aPHc1b8EEediL-zT>