Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2024 08:25:38 +0100 From: tuexen@freebsd.org To: garyj@gmx.de Cc: Nuno Teixeira <eduardo@freebsd.org>, current@freebsd.org, net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Request for Testing: TCP RACK Message-ID: <508E3B47-8E1B-469F-97B1-2171A3098888@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <20240313080624.6c73908c@ernst.home> References: <42C327BD-6CE4-43AA-A1AE-3BEC08D623DB@freebsd.org> <CAFDf7U%2BU3QpgsG-hY0u3tC_X9WKSRzuAM7Nfhzu-%2BqPBbs1nng@mail.gmail.com> <486915F0-456B-4B09-A8BC-93BBA79C4CA1@freebsd.org> <20240313080624.6c73908c@ernst.home>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> On 13. Mar 2024, at 08:06, Gary Jennejohn <garyj@gmx.de> wrote: >=20 > On Tue, 12 Mar 2024 20:14:17 +0100 > tuexen@freebsd.org wrote: >=20 >>> On 12. Mar 2024, at 14:39, Nuno Teixeira <eduardo@freebsd.org> = wrote: >>>=20 >>> Hello, >>>=20 >>> I'm curious about tcp RACK. >>>=20 >>> As I do not run on a server background, only a laptop and a rpi4 for >>> poudriere, git, browsing, some torrent and ssh/sftp connections, = will >>> I see any difference using RACK? >>> What tests should I do for comparison? >> You might want to read the following article in the FreeBSD Journal: >> = https://freebsdfoundation.org/our-work/journal/browser-based-edition/rack-= and-alternate-tcp-stacks-for-freebsd/ >>=20 >> There is no specific area for testing. Just test the stack on >> the systems you use with the workload you use and report back >> any issues... >>=20 >=20 > In the article we have option TCPHPTS and option TCP_RACK. But in > /sys/conf/NOTES we have options TCPHPTS and options TCP_RACK and > not option. Thanks for reporting, that is a typo in the article. It should always read options instead of option. Best regards Michael >=20 > -- > Gary Jennejohn
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?508E3B47-8E1B-469F-97B1-2171A3098888>