Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 12 Apr 2006 09:01:09 -0400 (EDT)
From:      Daniel Eischen <deischen@freebsd.org>
To:        Marius Strobl <marius@alchemy.franken.de>
Cc:        cvs-src@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org, cvs-all@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: cvs commit: src/lib/libc/sparc64 Symbol.map
Message-ID:  <Pine.GSO.4.64.0604120857330.19224@sea.ntplx.net>
In-Reply-To: <20060412085603.K25742@newtrinity.zeist.de>
References:  <200604111943.k3BJha5Q009375@repoman.freebsd.org> <Pine.GSO.4.64.0604111720450.13927@sea.ntplx.net> <20060412085603.K25742@newtrinity.zeist.de>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 12 Apr 2006, Marius Strobl wrote:

> On Tue, Apr 11, 2006 at 05:24:34PM -0400, Daniel Eischen wrote:
>> On Tue, 11 Apr 2006, Marius Strobl wrote:
>>
>>> marius      2006-04-11 19:43:36 UTC
>>>
>>>  FreeBSD src repository
>>>
>>>  Modified files:
>>>    lib/libc/sparc64     Symbol.map
>>>  Log:
>>>  - Move _Qp_* and __dtoul from FBSDprivate to the list of FBSD_1.0 symbols
>>>    as well as add __sparc_utrap_install to FBSD_1.0; these are required by
>>>    the SCD libc 64 psABI and thus meant to be officially exported symbols.
>>
>> FYI, there are no public _Qp_* symbols in Solaris' libc.  There are
>> public _Q_* symbols, however.  I'm not sure what the SCD libc 64 psABI
>> is...
>>
>
> I guess you looked at the 32bit libc; in the 64bit libc there are.

Ahh, we run 64-bit but I forgot that Solaris doesn't keep its 64-bit
libraries in /usr/lib.  When I was coming up with the original sparc64
symbol map and wasn't sure about some of those symbols, I mistakenly
looked in the 32-bit Solaris libc for some guidance.

-- 
DE



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.GSO.4.64.0604120857330.19224>