Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 02 Mar 2003 17:24:21 -0600
From:      Kirk Strauser <kirk@strauser.com>
To:        freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Portupgrade -- revisited
Message-ID:  <87r89pwdwa.fsf@strauser.com>
In-Reply-To: <200303021415.59947.kstewart@owt.com> (Kent Stewart's message of "Sun, 2 Mar 2003 14:15:59 -0800")
References:  <20030302192233.GA326@willow.raggedclown.intra> <15970.24641.603055.302342@guru.mired.org> <20030302200115.GA334@willow.raggedclown.intra> <200303021415.59947.kstewart@owt.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--=-=-=
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

At 2003-03-02T22:15:59Z, Kent Stewart <kstewart@owt.com> writes:

> portupgrade -puf portupgrade
> portupgrade -pufr png
> portupgrade -pufr fontconfig
> portupgrade -pufr libxml2
> portupgrade -pufr ghostscript-gnu

Interesting.  I almost always user `portupgrade -rR foo' without other
options.  That way, recursion works in both directions, and every package
that could possibly be affected in any way by upgrading `foo' gets updated.
I've been doing this for months and have never encountered a problem
situation.  Has anyone upgraded this way and still had trouble?
=2D-=20
Kirk Strauser
In Googlis non est, ergo non est.

--=-=-=
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQA+YpKo5sRg+Y0CpvERAmcQAJ4i6GEtovTkEFPRqmfftor2a11nfQCeKb0v
XIGyM1B259mMQ5P6PqAU6AE=
=m9kR
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-=-=--


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?87r89pwdwa.fsf>