Date: Sun, 5 Oct 1997 03:52:42 +1000 From: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au> To: helbig@Informatik.BA-Stuttgart.DE, joerg@FreeBSD.ORG Cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-usrbin@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/usr.bin/c89 c89.1 c89.sh Message-ID: <199710041752.DAA01431@godzilla.zeta.org.au>
index | next in thread | raw e-mail
>> joerg 1997/09/18 13:55:51 PDT
>>
>> Modified files:
>> usr.bin/c89 c89.1 c89.sh
>> Log:
>> Use -ansi -pedantic -trigraphs, as suggested by Bruce.
>>
>> Enforce that only Posix-spec'ed options are being used, so people could
>> use this as a Posixificator of some kind.
>
>But the -l flag should still be supported and documented.
It's also painful not to have -pipe.
>BTW, why doesn't the usage message (and manpage synopsis) comply
>to style(9)? Is this POSIX style :-)
POSIX.2 doesn't follow style(9) for many commands :-).
E.g., for mv:
POSIX:
mv [-fi] source_file target_file
mv [-fi] source_file ... target_dir
-current man page:
mv [-f | -i] source target
mv [-f | -i] source ... source directory
[^need an underscore here]
-current usages message:
mv [-f | -i] src target
mv [-f | -i] src1 ... srcN directory
[^^^^wrong if only 1 source]
FreeBSD doesn't follow the consistency rule here.
Bruce
help
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199710041752.DAA01431>