Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2016 16:16:18 +0300 From: Slawa Olhovchenkov <slw@zxy.spb.ru> To: Kristof Provost <kp@FreeBSD.org> Cc: stable@freebsd.org, freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ipfw fwd to closed port Message-ID: <20160609131618.GU75630@zxy.spb.ru> In-Reply-To: <F1894D5E-0951-4E6B-8BCF-CB25CD25A9A8@FreeBSD.org> References: <20160608230240.GA51364@zxy.spb.ru> <20160609130017.GA4071@vega.codepro.be> <20160609130601.GS75630@zxy.spb.ru> <F1894D5E-0951-4E6B-8BCF-CB25CD25A9A8@FreeBSD.org>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
On Thu, Jun 09, 2016 at 09:08:33AM -0400, Kristof Provost wrote: > > > On 9 Jun 2016, at 9:06, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote: > > > On Thu, Jun 09, 2016 at 03:00:17PM +0200, Kristof Provost wrote: > > > >> On 2016-06-09 02:02:40 (+0300), Slawa Olhovchenkov <slw@zxy.spb.ru> wrote: > >>> Forwarding by ipfw to closed local port generating RST packet with > >>> incorrect checksun. Is this know ussuse? Need open PR? > >> > >> Where did you capture the packet? If you've captured the packet on the > >> machine that generated it tcpdump may indeed claim that the checksum is > >> wrong, because it's computed by the hardware (so after tcpdump captured > >> it). > > > > On the tun0 (destination of RST packet routed to tun0). > > tun0: flags=8051<UP,POINTOPOINT,RUNNING,MULTICAST> metric 0 mtu 1500 > > options=80000<LINKSTATE> > > inet 192.168.4.1 --> 192.168.4.1 netmask 0xffffff00 > > inet6 fe80::240:63ff:fedc:ac9e%tun0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x9 > > nd6 options=21<PERFORMNUD,AUTO\_LINKLOCAL> > > Opened by PID 1345 > > > > tun0 don't computed checksum. > > I’m not sure I understand what you’re trying to say. > > In any case: either capture the packet outside the machine, or confirm > that the checksum is wrong by watching the relevant netstat counters. I am have machine with tun0 (see above) and ipfw rules: 04010 23880 2132855 fwd 127.0.0.1,3129 tcp from 192.168.0.0/16 to not me dst-port 80,3128,8080,8100-8105 recv tun0 # netstat -rn 192.168.4.0/24 192.168.4.1 UGS tun0 192.168.4.1 link#9 UH tun0 tun0 handled by coova-chilli. Initator from network 192.168.4.0/24 (ex: 192.168.4.4) send packet to outside, 8.8.8.8 for example. fwd on tun0 forwarded tin 127.0.0.1,3129. No listener on 127.0.0.1:3129, RST generated from 8.8.8.8:80 to 192.168.4.4:2345. This packet routed to tun0 an received by chilli. Checksums must be correct at this point, on tun0 interface for correct handling in chilli.home | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20160609131618.GU75630>