Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2006 17:08:42 -0400 From: John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org> To: Mikhail Teterin <mi+mx@aldan.algebra.com> Cc: Peter Jeremy <peterjeremy@optushome.com.au>, freebsd-current@freebsd.org, Robert Watson <rwatson@freebsd.org>, Joerg Wunsch <joerg@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: weird limitation on the system's binutils Message-ID: <200607071708.43790.jhb@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <200607071555.00993.mi%2Bmx@aldan.algebra.com> References: <200607010009.09231@aldan> <20060705171517.H18236@fledge.watson.org> <200607071555.00993.mi%2Bmx@aldan.algebra.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Friday 07 July 2006 15:55, Mikhail Teterin wrote: > середа 05 липень 2006 12:18, Robert Watson написав: > > Perhaps the world has changed since that time, but those sound like > > pretty good reasons to me. So these are my recollections, but since I'm > > not an expert in our toolchain bits, I could be off in the woods somewhere. > > Can we, perhaps start small and make the libiberty piece centrally available > (and of the most recent version)? > > There is even a port of (devel/gnulibiberty), which its maintainer (CC-ed), > I'm sure, will be glad to see obsoleted... > > We are currently building it four times: > > /usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/binutils/libiberty/libiberty.a > /usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/cc/cc_tools/libiberty.a > /usr/obj/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/binutils/libiberty/libiberty.a > /usr/obj/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/cc/cc_tools/libiberty.a > > And installing none... > > Halving that, and installing the result to be usable by ports would be a > decent improvement, would not it? Only if it doesn't suffer from all the same problems as libbfd.a. -- John Baldwin
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200607071708.43790.jhb>