Date: Sat, 26 Aug 2006 06:39:31 -0400 From: Tom Rhodes <trhodes@FreeBSD.org> To: pav@FreeBSD.org Cc: trhodes@FreeBSD.org, doc@FreeBSD.org, devon.odell@coyotepoint.com Subject: Re: Fix for ithread.9 Message-ID: <20060826063931.566f3d78.trhodes@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <1156587111.67821.4.camel@ikaros.oook.cz> References: <44EF355D.5050208@coyotepoint.com> <1156532704.8612.2.camel@ikaros.oook.cz> <20060825195110.450a1a7b.trhodes@FreeBSD.org> <1156587111.67821.4.camel@ikaros.oook.cz>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, 26 Aug 2006 12:11:51 +0200 Pav Lucistnik <pav@freebsd.org> wrote: > Tom Rhodes p=C3=AD=C5=A1e v p=C3=A1 25. 08. 2006 v 19:51 -0400: > > On Fri, 25 Aug 2006 21:05:04 +0200 > > Pav Lucistnik <pav@freebsd.org> wrote: > >=20 > > > Devon H. O'Dell p=C3=AD=C2=B9e v p=C3=A1 25. 08. 2006 v 13:37 -0400: > > >=20 > > > > I was discussing UMA with Robert Watson yesterday; specifically its= =20 > > > > usage implications in an interrupt context. He suggested adding som= e=20 > > > > information to ithread(9) specifying semantics for memory allocatio= n in=20 > > > > an interrupt context. So I came up with this tiny patch, shot it jh= b@'s=20 > > > > way, he reviewed it and told me to shoot it this way. > > > >=20 > > > > So here it is, apparently ready to be committed. > > >=20 > > > Applied, thanks! > >=20 > > After you fixed the hard sentence break issue, right Pav? ;) >=20 > Of course, Tom. ;) --=20 Tom Rhodes
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060826063931.566f3d78.trhodes>