Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2001 20:45:04 +0200 From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.freebsd.dk> To: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org> Cc: Robert Watson <rwatson@FreeBSD.ORG>, Kirk McKusick <mckusick@mckusick.com>, Rik van Riel <riel@conectiva.com.br>, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG, Matt Dillon <dillon@earth.backplane.com>, David Xu <bsddiy@21cn.com> Subject: Re: vm balance Message-ID: <42007.987619504@critter> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 18 Apr 2001 10:24:26 PDT." <3ADDCDCA.86D1B3BE@elischer.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <3ADDCDCA.86D1B3BE@elischer.org>, Julian Elischer writes: >If we merged vnodes and vm objects, >then if devices were not vnodes, how would you represent >a vm area that maps a device? You would use a VM object of course, but it would be a special kind of VM object, just like today... -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?42007.987619504>