Date: Sat, 4 Oct 2003 18:37:01 -0700 From: Wes Peters <wes@softweyr.com> To: Sam Leffler <sam@errno.com>, Brian Fundakowski Feldman <green@freebsd.org>, hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Is socket buffer locking as questionable as it seems? Message-ID: <200310041837.01922.wes@softweyr.com> In-Reply-To: <200310041139.52357.sam@errno.com> References: <200310040538.h945cDxp014188@green.bikeshed.org> <200310041139.52357.sam@errno.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Saturday 04 October 2003 11:39 am, Sam Leffler wrote:
> On Friday 03 October 2003 10:38 pm, Brian Fundakowski Feldman wrote:
> > I keep getting these panics on my SMP box (no backtrace or DDB or
> > crash dump of course, because panic() == hang to FreeBSD these days):
> > panic: receive: m == 0 so->so_rcv.sb_cc == 52
> > From what I can tell, all sorts of socket-related calls are "MP-safe"
> > and yet never even come close to locking the socket buffer. From
> > what I can tell, the easiest way for this occur would be sbrelease()
> > being called from somewhere that it's supposed to, but doesn't, have
> > sblock(). Has anyone seen these, or a place to start looking? Maybe
> > a way to get panics to stop hanging the machine? TIA if anyone has
> > some enlightenment.
>
> Haven't seen anything on my SMP test box. As Robert has already said
> sockets are still implicitly locked by Giant. You need to provide more
> information like what version you are running and what your system is
> doing when the panic occurs.
>
> FWIW panic does not hang for me so you might first try to figure out
> why that's occuring.
Is this one of the areas you are planning to get to, Sam?
--
Where am I, and what am I doing in this handbasket?
Wes Peters wes@softweyr.com
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200310041837.01922.wes>
