Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2010 11:41:07 -0700 From: Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org> To: John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org> Cc: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" <bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net>, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: BIND9 built w/--disable-ipv6 on 8.1-STABLE Message-ID: <4C9A4DC3.60001@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <201009220950.32294.jhb@freebsd.org> References: <4C98F433.6070506@FreeBSD.org> <20100921193101.GA95238@night.db.net> <20100922095724.C31898@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net> <201009220950.32294.jhb@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 9/22/2010 6:50 AM, John Baldwin wrote: > On Wednesday, September 22, 2010 6:02:08 am Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote: >> Can't we just do what lib/bind/config.mk already does? Since I've already answered this twice in the same thread, I'll leave it as an exercise for the reader to determine why I will not be making your proposed change. > Actually, I frequently build custom kernels w/o INET6, but don't necessarily > disable INET6 for the world build. However, why can't BIND just be fixed to > have sane behavior if the kernel doesn't support INET6? It already behaves as you expect it should, which I've already explained in detail twice in this same thread. These are not the droids you're looking for, move along. Doug -- ... and that's just a little bit of history repeating. -- Propellerheads Improve the effectiveness of your Internet presence with a domain name makeover! http://SupersetSolutions.com/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4C9A4DC3.60001>