Date: Wed, 7 Aug 1996 23:05:47 +0200 (MET DST) From: sos@FreeBSD.org To: phk@critter.tfs.com (Poul-Henning Kamp) Cc: gibbs@freefall.freebsd.org, nate@mt.sri.com, rgrimes@gndrsh.aac.dev.com, peter@spinner.dialix.com, current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Whither gcc 2.7? Message-ID: <199608072105.XAA00469@DeepCore.dk> In-Reply-To: <7504.839447566@critter.tfs.com> from Poul-Henning Kamp at "Aug 7, 96 09:52:46 pm"
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In reply to Poul-Henning Kamp who wrote:
> In message <199608071912.MAA00385@freefall.freebsd.org>, "Justin T. Gibbs" writ
>
> >Any way you slice it, we'll have to deal with this issue as soon as we
> >start supporting more than one arch. In fact, as Nate pointed out, the
> >PC98 stuff has already made this a problem we need to solve.
>
> I still think that we need to sit down and think VERY carefully before
> we import >all< of gcc.
>
> I will be against it all the way.
So, we should make a bmaked version, put it in the tree as usual, and
let the original (and pgcc and xxgcc..) be in ports...
No need for that contrib mess...
My 0.02 Dkr.
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Søren Schmidt (sos@FreeBSD.org) FreeBSD Core Team
Even more code to hack -- will it ever end
..
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199608072105.XAA00469>
