Date: Wed, 4 Mar 2015 16:19:35 +0000 From: "emaste (Ed Maste)" <phabric-noreply@FreeBSD.org> To: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Subject: [Differential] [Commented On] D2005: Start of arm64 toolchain support (sufficient for kernel-toolchain) Message-ID: <5cd7fdaceba784bcdc723217d0bc6d67@localhost.localdomain> In-Reply-To: <differential-rev-PHID-DREV-xkiyys7g7nptp5rxbteo-req@FreeBSD.org> References: <differential-rev-PHID-DREV-xkiyys7g7nptp5rxbteo-req@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
emaste added inline comments. INLINE COMMENTS Makefile.inc1:325 > Why wouldn't we need it for sparc64 if we removed ld and gcc? We would. I was originally planning require users to set CROSS_BINUTILS_PREFIX in order to make use of this, but Andy wanted it to be automatic. Do you have a sketch of something that would be a more generic way to do it? share/mk/src.opts.mk:233-238 I don't fully understand your comment here - if I understand correctly you're saying we should forcibly disable options that can't work on a given platform, not just disable them by default. Both binutils and gdb are the same in that regard at least, they both lack aarch64 support. REVISION DETAIL https://reviews.freebsd.org/D2005 To: emaste, bdrewery Cc: imp, andrew, freebsd-arm
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?5cd7fdaceba784bcdc723217d0bc6d67>