Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2013 12:40:45 -0400 From: Alfred Perlstein <bright@mu.org> To: Dmitry Morozovsky <marck@rinet.ru> Cc: src-committers@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, Eitan Adler <lists@eitanadler.com>, Gavin Atkinson <gavin@freebsd.org>, Xin LI <delphij@freebsd.org>, svn-src-head@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r251507 - head/usr.sbin/portsnap/portsnap Message-ID: <51BF3C0D.5060708@mu.org> In-Reply-To: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1306171957410.87647@woozle.rinet.ru> References: <201306072021.r57KLUfD046462@svn.freebsd.org> <CAF6rxgkxw-T52KyiVyJDv4A8OFCwrx8xyJZ0ATCb6vnCPCO68A@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1306162323331.2602@thunderhorn.york.ac.uk> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1306171957410.87647@woozle.rinet.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 6/17/13 11:59 AM, Dmitry Morozovsky wrote: > On Sun, 16 Jun 2013, Gavin Atkinson wrote: > >>>> Make 'portsnap alfred' overwrite ports tree if it's not created by a >>>> portsnap. >>> FWIW, the 'alfred' command is poorly named and is used by other >>> projects (ISTR portshaker uses it). It should also be documented. >> I would love to see this renamed - unfortunately the most obvious name for >> it "update" is already taken. I wonder if it should be named "auto"? > Hmm, 'forceupdate' maybe, in brief mimic to /etc/rc.d/* ? > I've already told MANY people that it's easy to use when they just run "portsnap alfred". I think we need to leave it as this point. An alias is fine. -- Alfred Perlstein VP Software Engineering, iXsystems
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?51BF3C0D.5060708>